Menu
What's new

  • Due to abuse, self-registration is disabled.

    Registration is only required for posting topics or replies. To register, make a request on any of the PIVX social media or chat channels.

    NOTE: To enhance forum security, new accounts that have no posts within a 30-day period are subject to being deleted.

Recent content by MrAli

  1. MrAli

    Roadmaps, Core Updates, and Building Market Momentum

    11 days have passed since our message tagging the developers, and not a single member of the Core team has bothered to provide even a brief reply or acknowledgment to this thread.
  2. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    Also, for full transparency to the community and everyone following this thread: One or two of our previous posts asking for accountability and raising these exact questions were silently deleted from this forum. Using Administrator privileges to quietly delete critical posts while demanding...
  3. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    @Jeffrey, Thanks for the diagram explaining standard exchange UTXO pooling mechanics. Nobody is disputing how exchange hot wallets aggregate inputs for withdrawals. But let's address the actual substance of the issue rather than hiding behind exchange mechanics: 1. An Anonymous, Cropped...
  4. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    You know, Liquid, when I saw that hidden trap in your post, it became crystal clear what people have been saying about things around here. Your only remaining play to discredit us was to pull a trick like that, so you could eventually claim: "Look, this isn't even a real person posting, it's...
  5. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    Context does not change on-chain math, Liquid. Funds from a proposal either went to market makers, or they went to private Masternode collaterals. No amount of "context" turns a 400,000 PIV transfer into an exchange sweeper. I am glad you acknowledged that there are real issues that need...
  6. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    Thank you, @ONeZetty. You articulated the exact core principle that has been overlooked in this discussion. User privacy on PIVX is sacred and must be protected. However, public DAO treasury funds require institutional transparency and verifiable custody. Using obfuscated or shielded paths for...
  7. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    Nice attempt at spin, @Eric_Stanek, but do not insult the intelligence of this community. Let us dismantle your "exchange" fairy tale with basic blockchain architecture: How Exchanges Actually Work (Sweepers & Hot Wallets): Exchanges use automated sweeper daemons. When a user deposits, the...
  8. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    I see that discussions are happening in the community right now. Come forward and speak your minds. This is supposed to be a free community. In the past, whenever someone spoke up, Eric and his friends would gang up on them from all sides and silence them. But now the floor is open and the...
  9. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    If that wallet belonged to me, @Jeffrey, then why did 120,400 PIVX leave **your own proposal address** to fund it? And please stop inventing theories: No exchange on earth (MEXC, XT, or WEEX) has only 10 transactions in its entire history, and **no exchange uses customer funds to run 25 voting...
  10. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    Nice fairy tale, @Eric_Stanek, but that’s not how blockchains work. You just said: *"I have not followed the transactions on a block explorer yet."* Maybe you should look before making up stories: If someone bought those coins on an exchange, the transaction would show an exchange deposit...
  11. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    You are leaving because there is no logical explanation, @Jeffrey. Think about what you just wrote: You claim you don't own this address, and you guess it might be "a user withdrawing large balances." If this address belongs to a random user or an unknown entity: **Why did 120,400 PIVX of...
  12. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    Wait, @Eric_Stanek. Which one is it? Was it "sarcasm", or was it a serious answer that "addresses my concern"? If it was sarcasm, then the question was never answered. If it was a serious answer that one of them is an exchange, then the question still stands: **Which exchange on earth...
  13. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    This isn't about personal ego, power, or reputation, @Eric_Stanek. @Jeffrey It is about public blockchain data that anyone can verify on the explorer: 1. Did the treasury funds from proposal `DHQHLf...` land in wallet `DT2hoNn3n3bB8b8QRoqvqWM9y3e7wo8XXz` via transaction...
  14. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    You have "no clue" who owns the other address, @Jeffrey? Then how did hundreds of thousands of PIVX from your own proposal address (`DHQHLf...`) get consolidated directly into that address via transactions `49e0326c...` and `ca82cf36...`? Did public DAO funds leave your proposal into an...
  15. MrAli

    Active PIVXMMFund12

    Thank him for what, @Eric_Stanek? Thank him for keeping unspent public treasury funds in a shielded address after repeatedly claiming that everything had already been sent to market makers? Or thank him for claiming that a wallet holding 3.2M PIVX and running 25 voting Masternodes belongs to...
See more
Top