Search results

Very good points. Thanks for the feedback @Liquid369 . Best we focus efforts on v6.0 then.

Preface: The comments below apply to both the PIVX Core wallet, and MyPIVXwallet.org. However, I am not up to speed on the Road Map plans for MPW. Plus, their tech stack and UI/UX/Audience is different. So, I will comment only with respect to the PIVX Core wallet, and leave it to the Community...

Well, that doesn't work in a DAO where there is no central authority, and more importantly, where a huge amount is done by volunteers. If you, or I, or both of us dissappear, PIVX is still a Meritocracy. It was never imposed. It just is. Last person who tried to change it was S3v3nH4cks...

I sense you are frustrated, because you feel you haven't been heard. But you have, and many people have responded. Ironically, you are not hearing those people. THAT is the issue. You were eventually banned from Discord, because you kept coming back with the exact same points that others...

PIVX is a Meritocracy. By definition, your skills, efforts and respect within the Community define your power. NOT how much you invested. This is the disconnect that I think is causing you the most stress. I agree it is difficult to work within a DAO/Meritocracy. Someone once said...

Yep. That's intentional. It is frustrating to explain things in a simple and polite way, yet they are ignored. The 'attacking' tone is a last ditch effort to get Borris to wake the f up and hear what we are trying to say. Alas, I agree, it doesn't work either. Many of us have tried polite...

I think the solution is dead simple. When reviewing a proposal, a MNO should look at the total value added to PIVX. If that value is greater than the cost of the proposal itself, it should receive a YES vote. That's all there is too it. There will always be parts of a proposal that look like...

Never said the poll itself, or any discussion was exercising Dictatorship. But, the outcome of increasing the limit would support centralizing power. I'm just trying to explain to Borris how he has it all wrong how the DAO operates. Many have tried many times. We've also tried ignoring him...

I guess you don't see the issue. Every single one of your ideas, is because YOU are NOT able to INCREASE YOUR CONTROL over things. Such an attitude is indeed an attack on the DAO. Focus on improving the DAO, and you will see your comments are received differently. Suggesting the 10% passing...

I already answered this. With a higher passing limit, you would have even more power to block proposals. The only benefit to a higher limit, is it would make it harder for a single whale to push thru a proposal. But, that's already been proven, and admitted by you, to no longer be the case...

I would also add that just by the nature of the proposal process, they tend to be accepted by everyone, or rejected by everyone. In other words, the process already weeds out mediocre proposals. When there is a controversial proposal, it is usually because someone is misunderstanding something...

Are polls here private? Or can we see who voted. Hard to prevent polls from being gamed too though with bot accounts.

Same polls could be here to keep it all in 1 place in the forum. But, that necessitates the question being pretty general I think. It is true that all feedback can influence MNO votes. So, even those without a vote can influence the votes by providing solid aupported logical feedback on any...

Actually, it would add even more power for certain MNOs to block proposals. We already have had many examples proving there is no MNO that can force votes through, and you have admitted this. As such, it would achieve the opposite of what you propose giving more blocking power to whales...

Because if you were involved in building Trezar, that would explain a lot.

I'm just stating facts. They are not true because I am exercising some kind of authority. They are true, even if I didn't exist. A person can't be forced to volunteer or to stop volunteering. In fact, the FREEDOM to do so, is the definition of Volunteer! Same goes for a proposal. Others can...

Narcissistic? Communist? Never been called either before. Thanks for the laugh. But, what I see from your response, is classic projection.

Dude, I haven't been able to pass things on my own for many many years. Really wish you would understand how the DAO works. But, it will become obvious soon enough. Question: What must you do, if I tell you to stop/start volunteering time for PIVX? (Hint: Nothing. Let that sink in.)

Re: "I'm not agreeing to anything to do with Meritocracy." Well, I specifically asked; "Do you agree with this process?" which was by definition Meritocracy. You then answered; "Yes ..." Later, you stated; "I'm not agreeing to anything to do with Meritocracy." REALLY hard to understand you...

The PIVX Meritocracy is not something any person put in place. It is a natural thing that happens, when many passionate people volunteer their time. Social accounts will not be handed off to an untrusted person who has not proven themselves and stood the test of time. Your approach is exactly...