Search results

@SiggeB The main issue I see, is that we need to get the Community to agree to a set of common goals. Until we can do that, any coaching will have little value. With a set of common goals, everyone can use them to shape their proposal outcomes, and the entire team can be measured together, to...

Can we list the 'Hubs' you describe? My guess is that they are: 1. Community. 2. Business Development. 3. Software Development. 4. Marketing. 5. Treasury/MNOs. Am I missing any? Should the list be more granular?

EXTREMELY HAPPY to see this DATA! I know it isn't always possible to grab data, depending on what any given proposal is for, but when it is available, proposal owners absolutely should leverage it. I am NOT surprised to see El Salvador mentioned often in the stats. If any culture understands...

Kudos for using the Forum TABLES and BULLETS functionality to make the proposal easier to read!

Should we should start a new account on BitcoinTalk.org? Or is that now properly ignored in the industry because it is so archaic and hopefully now obsolete?

Video 1: Looks good! Video 2: A few spots when the audio say 'Here!' I can't see the cursor. Also, I am not sure we should mention XPub without describing the use case.

@robertjack No one has been banned for having a different view. They were banned for their behavior.

I know there was a time she was trying to find someone to do Instagram, but no one could dedicate time to it, so she just started giving it more time.

Twitter/X: @_PIVX, @PIVXcommunity Instagram, Medium (somewhat recently) and Blue Sky (very recently). I don't think she has managed Facebook for many years. Perhaps 4 or 5.

You OK letting this effort be killed too? Note that post went out one day before the event. What value do you give to those views? LeacyMcK is the founder of the Privacy Roundtable. Because of that effort, PIVX is now included far more often, when listing privacy coins. Plus, we get major...

You only focus on Twitter views when that is a very small part of the huge value LeacyMcK's proposal returns. So, let me ask you this, is 1.6K views on CMC, for ONE of the many announcements value added? Or are you OK with that social being killed too?

What a great idea. Let's start a trend.

In order to agree to disagree, the respectful process is for each side to hear each other first. You haven't. In fact once again you refuse to listen. So, No. We can't agree to disagree. You haven't supported your side at all. The future of PIVX is worth the time to do Due Diligence. You are...

Yes. Difference is, the sum entirety of support for your position is that you THINK you are right. Conversely, myself and others have provided MANY MANY data points, logic and rational thought, showing you are wrong. You just keep making the same assertion. We keep coming back with more and more...

Re: "You've posted and shown that using hastags increases engagment by 21%." Yes, and LeacyMcK does of course use hashtags. So, that factoid is completely useless to your argument. As such, you have done nothing to support your position. You have simply restated it again - exactly as I said you...

Re: "I am sick of this excuse its the algos. X/twitter is the most open free speech platform in the world." A simple search here in this forum, and I found this: https://forum.pivx.org/threads/content-strategist.2032/#post-5307 So, it has been explained to you before, that this is not an...

Notice how you completely ignored my question? Brick wall syndrome again. Difference for me, is I reply with facts, logic and rational thought. You don't. We can't understand you if you don't provide support for your arguments. You can't understand us if you don't read what we write and listen...

Once again, you fail to acknowledge or comprehend what is being said to you. It literally is like talking to a brick wall. Also, your concern about the selection of hashtags has come up before, and LeacyMcK responded based on her experience. Do you recall the specifics of her response?

You said; "I hardly even read your full posts tbh." That contradicts this statement; "I think your just refusing to see my view? I can see yours!" Make up your mind. Read everything I reply with, and come back with counter arguments or facts and logic not already countered, and we can move...

You just proved my point. You are upset YOU are not being heard. So, you don't read/listen to the counter arguments. The fact that there ARE counter arguments, means you HAVE BEEN HEARD. You're just wrong. Hypocritically, you are upset for not being heard, when it is you that is not hearing...