Punctuation problems? You know what im saying...how about would it make sense for him to expand into other socials considering your supporting this proposal but say we dont need another x? Would you like to @Rigden15937 needs be the first question?
Active rigden bastyon s 008
- Thread starter Rigden15937
- Start date
Eric_Stanek
Well-known Pivian
First, yes, your lack of punctuation, spelling and sentence structure, makes it hard to understand you.
Second, did you not read what I wrote here?
Active - rigden bastyon s 008
Name: rigden bastyon s 008 Term: 3 cycle Cycle Amount: 3016 Total Amount: 9048 Author: @Rigden15937 Receiver: @Rigden15937 Address: D9i9e44gQhoto8wKxtfCpiyPSDgaMycXYK Created: 07.01.2025 Status: Active Vote Hash: abb484774e6974a9ba494d2617762034cab491a7d5fd3b2fbfde1f73544d2e12 Hi pivx...
forum.pivx.org
Read it and agree! We don't need another! We already have a poorly active one. Let him work on that one to get more engagement hopefully! It would only be a trial...2 heads better than one...we want more than 2 tho! Different timezone people, activity at all times should be the goal.
Eric_Stanek
Well-known Pivian
People can have the best intentions, and be trusted, but they still need to prove themselves first. What ever happened to 'Drapper' (Not sure I have the name right) and his promises of being able to do amazing things with the PIVX TikTok account? There were others like him too. They were given opportunities to run with, and didn't last.
First step is to view, like, re-post, and engage with social channels. If a person can't do those initial steps, then the commitment to do more certainly isn't there. They need to prove they can do the work first.
First step is to view, like, re-post, and engage with social channels. If a person can't do those initial steps, then the commitment to do more certainly isn't there. They need to prove they can do the work first.
And until you do you don't know. As long as there systems in place to remove their access what's the problem? They've done more than that and in my eyes proven themselves to expand our official socials.
Again I'm assuming they want to do this?
Your just the gift that keeps on giving aswell. I love you for it. Who are you to say that? O wait a masternode owner with the power to pass and fail proposals...is this not what I've been saying controls the direction of pivx?
Eric_Stanek
Well-known Pivian
Often it seems like you don't even read my comments.
They can first prove themselves first. Nothing stops them. No permission needs to be granted. They can JFDI.
Access can't always be controlled. It depends on the platform. For example, just because they may share a password, doesn't mean they can't change it and lock out others.
Eric_Stanek
Well-known Pivian
Not following. Sounds like you are saying we should completely ignore the fact that an individual has ignored the opportunity to prove themselves first, and just hope and pray they do a good job.
They have been doing socials for months! Often without pay! You dont agree aswell as multiple other prominent figures in pivx that there shouldn't be any more channels! Maybe now is the time for you to state what you consider proving yourself because in my view they have both already done that.
In my view they have proven themselves which is why I believe this constant repetition of they need to prove it has been a smokescreen to not hand over any control to other people. Your going deeper into this hole, showing that these "people in charge" let's reword that to "people who have access" won't relinquish any of that control. Even if funding is rejected!
You agree there shouldn't be any more social channels, they have been active on social media for months often without payments yet this in your eyes is not enough.
In my view they have proven themselves which is why I believe this constant repetition of they need to prove it has been a smokescreen to not hand over any control to other people. Your going deeper into this hole, showing that these "people in charge" let's reword that to "people who have access" won't relinquish any of that control. Even if funding is rejected!
You agree there shouldn't be any more social channels, they have been active on social media for months often without payments yet this in your eyes is not enough.
Eric_Stanek
Well-known Pivian
Well, it is 4:50AM here. I don't need to repeat myself hoping you will understand. What I need is sleep. I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree.
Morning here! Night owl you are. Sweet dreams!
Upon reviewing the conversation I'm making a few comments:
@Rigden15937 I appreciate you inputting more stats for us to go over. I believe you in the sense that Bastyon has been good. I still don't get it on my radar, which does not mean it is a net negative. It's harder to understand when many trends caught are on X. It does not mean we should stop Bastyon posting.
@Eric_Stanek @Gerrald I see you both are taking a good interest in this proposal. Lets not argue semantics when it comes to the issue at hand for how do we get Rigden some funding since he has shown his dedication to PIVX. I think that's what we have to focus on. I don't think he should stop Bastyon but maybe when Rigden gets to his "thought provoking" content, we can spread those across socials if they align enough in the brand and such that we do in the main ones. As of right now he does get to freely "figure out what works" for Bastyon.
I think the situation is a blend of what both of you are saying. No need for "control" to be handed over, just us working together. More content the better. More engagement the better. This also does include maybe some people doing more on X with personal accounts so its just not us talking to the ether. Organically our conversations are not easy to engage in, but with the community starting it off, we can make it roll and capitalize more.
What say you guys?
PS. Thanks for not making it bigger, I was worried when I came to enter here. @Eric_Stanek you could have let a bit more slide
but either way kudos to a semi-civil convo for you two. @Gerrald thank you for trying to keep on track and keeping it about the proposal directly. It makes me feel good that its an improvement... lol
@Rigden15937 I appreciate you inputting more stats for us to go over. I believe you in the sense that Bastyon has been good. I still don't get it on my radar, which does not mean it is a net negative. It's harder to understand when many trends caught are on X. It does not mean we should stop Bastyon posting.
@Eric_Stanek @Gerrald I see you both are taking a good interest in this proposal. Lets not argue semantics when it comes to the issue at hand for how do we get Rigden some funding since he has shown his dedication to PIVX. I think that's what we have to focus on. I don't think he should stop Bastyon but maybe when Rigden gets to his "thought provoking" content, we can spread those across socials if they align enough in the brand and such that we do in the main ones. As of right now he does get to freely "figure out what works" for Bastyon.
I think the situation is a blend of what both of you are saying. No need for "control" to be handed over, just us working together. More content the better. More engagement the better. This also does include maybe some people doing more on X with personal accounts so its just not us talking to the ether. Organically our conversations are not easy to engage in, but with the community starting it off, we can make it roll and capitalize more.
What say you guys?
PS. Thanks for not making it bigger, I was worried when I came to enter here. @Eric_Stanek you could have let a bit more slide
but either way kudos to a semi-civil convo for you two. @Gerrald thank you for trying to keep on track and keeping it about the proposal directly. It makes me feel good that its an improvement... lolI tried my best to keep things about the proposal and an improvement is a great complimentUpon reviewing the conversation I'm making a few comments:
@Rigden15937 I appreciate you inputting more stats for us to go over. I believe you in the sense that Bastyon has been good. I still don't get it on my radar, which does not mean it is a net negative. It's harder to understand when many trends caught are on X. It does not mean we should stop Bastyon posting.
@Eric_Stanek @Gerrald I see you both are taking a good interest in this proposal. Lets not argue semantics when it comes to the issue at hand for how do we get Rigden some funding since he has shown his dedication to PIVX. I think that's what we have to focus on. I don't think he should stop Bastyon but maybe when Rigden gets to his "thought provoking" content, we can spread those across socials if they align enough in the brand and such that we do in the main ones. As of right now he does get to freely "figure out what works" for Bastyon.
I think the situation is a blend of what both of you are saying. No need for "control" to be handed over, just us working together. More content the better. More engagement the better. This also does include maybe some people doing more on X with personal accounts so its just not us talking to the ether. Organically our conversations are not easy to engage in, but with the community starting it off, we can make it roll and capitalize more.
What say you guys?
PS. Thanks for not making it bigger, I was worried when I came to enter here. @Eric_Stanek you could have let a bit more slide
thanks! The whole goal should be to expand and add new people.