Search results

I am not sure this is a good method of being voted in, by mentioning someone that is a voter needs to be dealt with 😂 I agree with collaboration and not a top-down hierarchy, which we already do have for the most part. I think our largest struggle is just the larger intercommunication because...

No one is shutting down your view, they are requesting a way to work better with you because the conversation tone makes it difficult to work with you. Nowhere in any of this have I said any of the questions are out of line but what gets into. Did I take your breaking down his qualifications as...

Do you not see this as particularly pointed to the aggression gleaned from it? The inclusion of others is making it messy. While we know this is a sore point, not everyone needs to be beaten over the head with it. Where is a different view shut down currently? We allow you to say what you want...

This is why the call would help! And then we would post the transcript here so everyone is aware of what was discussed so that can be clarified. The standard is simple manners. You and Eric were both informed of what it is moving forward. So lets say I set them, and that's that. It does not...

Grow up over the political stuff man. Im not a leftist, I am absolutely right wing. The difference is I am also a moderator. My job is to keep you guys from looking like you are fighting. So theres an issue here. I have a job to do, I have asked you to respect said rules. You have said you wont...

Why does this need to feel so aggressive though? His goal is to talk vs text so things do not get misconstrued. How about for the call you guys can record it and we can transcribe it? This way nothing is left out and you can feel like it is not trying to be a 'backdoor meeting'? I like the idea...

Understandable! We need more awareness of this work so voters can adequately vote for them. As @Gerrald is not in Discord, more updates on forums and potentially Telegram can get the word out more about your work. Sometimes it is hard as you see the voters are adding more scrutiny to proposals...

Morning! Let's take a look at the current social standings. The work is not being outsourced but by those who think they can maximize the potential on those platforms. As you well know, many operate very differently from others, requiring differing approaches. I agree that the time is now to...

Okay, let us clarify some things so we can settle this and move forward constructively. There are some things we need to address here and settle. First and foremost this is a project that we must respect to keep these forums clean from any bad language or toxicity. Users can have things to...

I think this is a cool idea utilizing Nostr so we can do more news content. But is it more for the creator or for us?

I think thats an area for improvement for the clarity! Absolutely. We believe there should be a balance but when it also comes down to a situation of others devolving into a fight on someone else's post about that person, is that really the correct place? Is it constructive when it becomes an...

Name: Liquid369-Nov-Jan25 Term: 3 Cycle Cycle Amnt: 30,000 Total Amnt: 90,000 Author: Liquid369 Receiver: Liquid369 Address: DS22VkCcwGyaLXkTS9ci9cCLkmWzhAf5yJ Created: 11-11-2024 Status: Active Vote Hash: 6012d1b002af8921c160ceea79468cb1835259479762dc688b10cfa834ea7d6a Liquid369 Proposal...

Agreed. Leacy always willing to bend over backwards to get things done! I just again want to appeal to the naysayers, if we could at least get a reason. Do not cut the head of the department off! We should soon see the fruits of the content strategists labor.

Agreed. Just was looking at the current status of proposals. Some people are wondering why Core is slow, they downvoting a major part of Core with @Alessandro Rezzi . If we want to see things progress downvoting him is just shooting ourselves in the foot. As we have stated before we have been at...

Absolutely can update you. Sorry for the delay have been sick the last few days and am just getting to a head space to work and check more actively. There has been updated to the two pull requests above for more things that were changed/reviewed. https://github.com/PIVX-Project/PET4L/pull/22...

Im not sure how you think this works? I was trying to offer help and you return with a threat? I still need more information in order to assist you. What is your wallet version?

Hello bud can you give us a bit more information? Firstly no one is stealing, if you have rewards in your wallet and have updated as long as you were not forked and staking on the different chain all the rewards should still be in the wallet. If you try going to wallet repair and selecting the...

Ah so one caveat to this its mainly volume. They maximize volume with little liquidity, but we need strength in our liquidity. But we can probably use this once the liquidity is settled to add to volume, still have to read more on it. Good suggestion thank you

you might want to check to see if you a forked. https://toolbox.pivx.org/en/forked/ Please also do not accept any private message or dm help

We will look, at first glance seems limited on exchanges it can support. The only concern is how is the volume analyzed as from this because places like cmc will try to hide “fake volumes” or report our volumes are potentially misleading. Have you got any experience with it?