Active Ale PIVX dev November-December

[Alessandro Rezzi]

Name: Ale Dev Nov-Dec
Term: 2 Cycles
Cycle Amnt: 25,000
Total Amnt: 50,000
Author: Alessandro Rezzi
Receiver: Alessandro Rezzi
Address: D8QgxwvpP4jB87snTP9Z2ZThV4aL9WJWB4
Created: 10-17-2024
Status: Active
Vote Hash: 889d7d3f177fc5466d64ecd88128993ef1f48c18174780d03e30c3dac6abfd44

Proposal info:

This proposal will cover my development cost for the month of November and December. I plan to work on My PIVX Wallet and the Core Wallet, the latter provided that we manage to organize.

Last proposal update:

My last proposal was for the month of June. Due to university exams I couldn't develop, so to compensate I'm working the month of October without asking for any funds. So far my contributions have been:

• MPW-401, MPW-412, MPW-422, MPW-423: Where I found and fixed some bugs of MPW 2.0;
• MPW-402, MPW-407, Shield-Lib-88: Where I proposed some optimizations for MPW and the Shield Library;
• MPW-400, MPW-408: Where I improved the unit test coverage and trivially cleaned up some code;
• A lot of code review.

What I will do in the next two cycles:

• I will keep contributing to the development of MPW 2.1. Among the new features of the next version there will be the shield activity, whose current status can be found in MPW-416.
• If we have enough developers on the core wallet and we manage to organize I will keep contributing toward the v6.0.

 

[Eric_Stanek]

Link submitted from website isn't correct. https://pivx.org/proposals

Hope everyone still finds the proposal!

 

[Duddino]

I'm very happy to have Alessandro back to working on MPW and the related projects.
Since his return, he has made several big PRs like shield activity and made some seriously high quality reviews catching small details that had been missed by the author and the other reviewer.

It's also nice having another contributor to the Shield WASM Library, as I had been forced to merge without reviews when he was gone.

I don't know why he has been receiving negative votes this cycle, but I urge MNs to reconsider this decision.

 

[Jeffrey]

I'm very happy to have Alessandro back to working on MPW and the related projects.
Since his return, he has made several big PRs like shield activity and made some seriously high quality reviews catching small details that had been missed by the author and the other reviewer.

It's also nice having another contributor to the Shield WASM Library, as I had been forced to merge without reviews when he was gone.

I don't know why he has been receiving negative votes this cycle, but I urge MNs to reconsider this decision.

Likewise, fantastic development team. Looking forward to seeing all the work you guys are about to pushout.

I support these proposals! Hope the MNs voting no without mentioning why change their mind.

 

[Liquid369]

I'm very happy to have Alessandro back to working on MPW and the related projects.
Since his return, he has made several big PRs like shield activity and made some seriously high quality reviews catching small details that had been missed by the author and the other reviewer.

It's also nice having another contributor to the Shield WASM Library, as I had been forced to merge without reviews when he was gone.

I don't know why he has been receiving negative votes this cycle, but I urge MNs to reconsider this decision.

Agreed. Just was looking at the current status of proposals. Some people are wondering why Core is slow, they downvoting a major part of Core with @Alessandro Rezzi . If we want to see things progress downvoting him is just shooting ourselves in the foot. As we have stated before we have been at ***barely*** enough devs to review pull requests. You guys are a large backbone to this operation! Hopefully MNOs read this and adjust their votes. 6.0 progress is stalled without his contributions.