Not sure where this concern is coming from.
There is no concern
The only statements ONeZetty makes related to exchanging PIVX for fiat are;
"... being realistic, it will be necessary to convert this first transfer in Fiat, since otherwise it may not be possible to start ..."
"To convert the PIV to fiat I will be able to make the necessary arrangements using traditional payment channels, if the ambassador [vendor] is not able to do so."
In other words, he doesn't want to do exchanges, but understands that in order to move forward, initially it may be required.
Yes and that is what I called banking business. and I wanted to know about the option " if the vendor"is not able to do so.
At a high level, there is 4,000 PIV for this proposal. Even if he took an extreme 10% exchange fee, we are then talking about a grand total of $80. From that, there is indeed real fees that ONeZetty would have to pay anyways. So, I would hardly call this a 'banking business'.
It just seems questions like this type of questioning is 'micro-managing'.
I don't care about the name, maybe micromanaging this fits it better in the beginning, but could also develop into a banking business when done on a bigger scale
Besides, there is absolutely no way to 'police' if such an exchange happens or not anyways. But, we do know the vendor will have the option to exchange PIVX to fiat any ways he/she likes as it is a free market.
Never said that policing would be necessary. Yes, the vendor can exchange it on exchanges or maybe with onezetty if he's supporting the businesses and help them with the exchanging in the beginning.
Basically, if these questions are sincere, then there is no trust and you should just vote NO.
ehhhhm please?
I like the approach and the questions I have are for a better understanding of it. And in case this would lead to some kind of business option for onezetty I would be absolutely okay with that as he is bringing his time and effort.
How can you say I don't trust it? How do you know that? I think I know better if I trust the concept than you.
In the other discussion, you claimed I would have asked for merch, but I had asked only if merch is one of the promo options.
I gently ask you not to put my words into the opposite anymore or to make it look as if I had claimed certain things. Thank you.
An answer like this doesn't help in the progress.
Also, why do you think you can advise me on what to vote for or against? I'm not stupid! I understand the proposal and I like it, so I decide to vote for it.
I just look at it this way ......
that'S okay but please don't make it look as if this is my point of view.
If we get 10+ images, plus a story, from each of 4 vendors, for a total of 4,000 PIV, that works out to 100 PIV or $18 per image to post all over social media, each of which 'screams' the message of "Adoption, Adoption, Adoption!". That is an extremely good deal!
I never said sth else
When we get those images, and stories, over the course of say 3 months, THAT is all we can measure, and how we should judge the value of this proposal.
Thats good
The rest doesn't really matter.
Well, for me it does. It would be good to see if sth happens after three months or not and if Onezetty is needed as a middleman or not. Everything else would be like starting a project sth and then after three months forgetting it. It will be interesting to see if it develops and what is needed for it over a longer period of time