What's new
  • Due to abuse, self-registration is disabled.

    Registration is only required for posting topics or replies. To register, make a request on any of the PIVX social media or chat channels.

    NOTE: To enhance forum security, new accounts that have no posts within a 30-day period are subject to being deleted.

Pending Submission Testnet6-Funds

Liquid369

Administrator
Code:
Name: Testnet6Topup2
Term: 3 Cycles
Cycle Amnt: 20,050
Total Amnt: 60,150
Author: Liquid369
Receiver: Liquid369
Address: 
Created: 09‑21‑2026
Status: Pending Submission
Vote Hash:



Ongoing hosting for Testnet6. Testnet6Funds and Testnet6Topup have the earlier pricing; Testnet6Topup is complete, 3 of 3 paid, 45,000 PIV.

This is not a final top-up. Testnet6 is a standing environment and it costs what it costs for as long as it runs. It phases down rather than ends: every cohort currently runs on my hardware because nobody else is on the network, and each outside participant that brings up a node is a node I can retire. The same for testing phases as they close. I expect the ask to shrink, and I would rather come back with a smaller number than pretend this is the last one.

The fleet

16 hosts, 159 PIVX instances, 145 masternodes split 45 IPv4 / 50 IPv6 / 50 Tor. Each cohort clears LLMQ minSize on its own, which is the only way to test quorum formation per address family. The chain is past block 26,000 and has run the full ladder from fresh genesis through PoW, the PoS handover at 201, every staged activation, and v6 at 5000.

145 masternodes across three address families cannot be run on one box, and the IPv6 and Tor cohorts are the entire point. Per /api/v2/mncount as of 2026-09-13, mainnet is 2,108 enabled: 318 IPv4 against 1,340 IPv6 and 446 onion, so 84.5% of the network is the part that has never been tested against v6. Fifteen servers with 47 IPv4 and 51 IPv6 is what that costs.

Chain is public at https://testnet-explorer.liquid369.wtf. Fuzzbawls, Duddino and Luke can have Grafana and shell access on request; Duddino and Luke are already provisioned. This is not a box nobody else can see into.

Costs

Contabo, from invoice 1437386300010 dated 31.08.2026:

Code:
Line                                Qty   Unit/mo    Monthly
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cloud VPS 8      (cb1-cb5)            5    $16.80     $84.00
Cloud VPS 8      US Central surcharge 3     $4.05     $12.15
Cloud VPS 6      (cb6-cb10)           5     $9.00     $45.00
Cloud VPS 6      US West surcharge    2     $2.50      $5.00
Cloud VPS 30 NVMe (explorer)          1    $16.80     $16.80
--------------------------------------------------------------
Contabo subtotal                                     $162.95
OVH  5 x Kimsufi KS-1/KS-5 + 30 failover IPv4        $220.00
--------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                $382.95

No IPv4 line items on the Contabo invoice, so those addresses come with the plans. OVH is an estimate: 5 boxes at $20 plus 30 failover IPv4 at $4.00.

16 hosts, 118 vCPU, 348 GB RAM, 8.9 TB disk, 47 IPv4, 51 IPv6, 159 instances.

Monitoring, not in this ask

Prometheus, Loki, Grafana and Alertmanager share tn6-cb5 with 9 masternodes because there has never been a budget for a separate box. It reached 84% of a 290GB disk on 2026-09-21 and would have taken the monitoring and the masternodes down together. I capped log retention to buy room, which holds for now. The proper fix is a larger plan on that host or a dedicated one, roughly $10 to $17/mo. Not in the ask.

The number

20,000 PIV/cycle at $0.024/PIV, plus 50 PIV per cycle reimbursing the submission fee, same as last time. That is $1,440 against about $1,150 of hosting across the three cycles.

The gap covers the sell. PIV has to be moved to fiat to pay Contabo and OVH, and on thin books that does not fill at spot. What 60,000 actually returns:

Code:
Realised vs spot     Proceeds    Against $1,150 hosting
-----------------------------------------------------
spot   $0.02400       $1,440            +$291
-10%   $0.02160       $1,296            +$147
-15%   $0.02040       $1,224             +$75
-20%   $0.01920       $1,152              +$3
-25%   $0.01800       $1,080        short  $69

Sized to survive a 20% adverse move and no further. Worse than that comes out of pocket, and the difference will be asked in a top-up.



Not part of this request, listed because it is what the fleet is being used for and people ask. Open on PIVX-Project/PIVX as of 2026-09-14: #2984 testnet6 and LLMQ, #2985 ProRegTx self-spend consensus fix, #2986 be32enc build detection, #2937 JSON-RPC 2.0 backport. #2805 is panleone's earlier IPv6/Tor DMN attempt, not mine. Branches carrying testnet6 findings that are not yet PRs: 2026_dmn_ipv6_tor, 2026_fix_mn_find_uaf, 2026_dip3_dip6_bugs, 2026_reject_rfc9637_ipv6_doc, 2026_manual_peer_no_stall_disconnect. PIVX-Crawler #1 merged 2026-09-14.

None of that work is funded here, and none of it is being billed. This proposal is for servers.


Voting
GUI Wallet: DAO page → vote “yes” on Testnet6Topup
Console:
Code:
mnbudgetvote many  yes
To vote no, replace yes with no.
 
Top