Search results

What is the current coverage in MPW for unit tests in % ? I realize it can be hard to provide an accurate number. I'm just looking for a ball-park. Thanks!

There are likely opportunities for collaboration with Dash, so I was open to helping get the conversation going. But other than that, I remained neutral. A project merge needs a TON of communication on both sides. One collaboration that may be a good start, is a joint effort on developing...

Ya. As soon as possible, the opportunity was made public for transparency and to involve the Community. But, since nothing has been decided it is hard to evaluate. Another approach, would be to just make an assumption that there is a 'Win-Win' in there somewhere, and both Communities try to...

Probably from the same MNOs that demand proposals have excessive detail and regular reports with lots of detail too. Because without that, they claim they can't possibly decide how to vote. However, in yet another massive double standard, they expect you to know what you are doing wrong...

Just because you can't see all the work Fuzz does, doesn't mean he isn't working or the value isn't there. I get that you WANT to see it. I do too. But, I can't either. Knowing that it isn't always possible, even with detailed reporting, I then base my decisions on what people I trust, who are...

You have yet to give ANY logic at all, as to why this proposal should not be supported. Those voting it down are deeply hurting PIVX. It is utterly shameful and disgusting.

Prediction: Super Proposals are coming back, to block votes from MNOs that lack critical thinking skills.

So, it looks like the book is a download, that costs about $3.15 USD. Have I got that right? Description here: https://www.fin-savvy.co.za/ Conversion here:

Is this like an loose insert included in the new textbook, or is it printed on a page in a section of the textbook? Are there examples of what has been done before? 1,200 copies were sold over what time frame?

To be honest, I have steered clear of supporting wPIV because we never had the budget to fund a liquidity pool. But, now we do. There are still lots of issues, but perhaps it can be considered now.

Lending/Borrowing and Yield Farming isn't that attractive, because it would have to beat the native Staking/Masternode rewards of 13% to 18%. It would also have to beat those rates significantly, to offset the risk of not controlling your keys. Same issues undermine the other features too. How...

You stated liquidity will have strategies implemented, but liquidity means LOTS of funds, and you haven't explained where that will come from. Without liquidity being properly addressed, it will all fail. Please clarify.

Looks like you have 2 copies of this proposal on the forum. One is DRAFT and the other is ACTIVE, with a solid Passing and Funded status. Perhaps ask users to move their comments to the ACTIVE proposal copy and archive this one. See here for the other ACTIVE copy...

Unfortunately, I can't prove the negative. That is a logical impossibility. So, I have no choice but to let you think that. But, while NOT conclusive, the fact is, you are the one who has DM'd multiple team members threatening to vote NO on their proposals. Actions have consequences. Own it.

Pretty sure I covered all your points already even though your reply came in while I was replying to the earlier post from you.

First, why do you even care about the new 'deal/opportunity'? I mean, we have the opportunity to stay listed on Binance, but you don't seem to care about that deal. Instead of letting the entire team work towards releasing the code, you have them scrambling to find ways to support Fuzzbawls...

1. Nope. Not me. I have voted yes everywhere. The team knows this. The casual reader new to PIVX might believe you, but what the Team knows matters more to me. 2. You want a 'Dev Report'? Have you not been reading the PIVX Labs Superblock Report? It has been published monthly for a year! Here is...

If his role is needed, which I agree, and you imply you agree with too ... wouldn't it be prudent to find a replacement first? So, WTF? Lack of commits? Most ... 90% ... of what Fuzzbawls does is Dev Ops, which does NOT involve commits! The 'last devs' were awesome at writing code. They were...

Just over a year ago, PIVX embarked on a major change to the rewards system. This of course required consensus. Not just from the Masternode Owners, but also from the Community itself. This was no easy task, and took months before we were able to obtain an informal, but obvious major consensus...

It is strange that with so many NO votes, there isn't any feedback provided here to explain the issues. That just leaves all of us guessing. I'm guessing the down votes are because a whale or 2, don't understand the huge amount of work that goes in DevOps, and that it largely isn't covered by...