Active PIVXMMFund12

[Jeffrey]

DT2hoNn3n3bB8b8QRoqvqWM9y3e7wo8XXz

Okay let me do some digging. This address you provided has a large balance. If you check where it received PIVX from it’s from the same pool
From the other address you sent

You can confirm that here:

PIVX Transaction ca82cf366d392b9ff9e96b6d020ba615925bf0c054deeaf481299822ab359751

chainz.cryptoid.info

And here:

PIVX Wallet of DQPAowS7kg17Dd5Yc5p3oknpNG3Nm6JjrQ

chainz.cryptoid.info

So we can say it’s either a cold storage for one of the exchanges or perhaps a user withdrawing large balances. It’s all on chain for you to review yourself. The address doesn’t belong to me.


Anyway enjoy your weekend. Done here

 

[Eric_Stanek]

It was sarcasm in that you should be able to figure it out yourself, to determine which is which. What I understood when he said 'no clue', is that he has no time to waste on your failed logic.

I have not followed the transactions on a block explorer yet. But it seems perfectly logical to me, given we have so many Masternodes now, and there are difficulties with liquidity making it hard to find PIV to buy for those Masternodes, that the instant that PIVX was put into liquidity at an Exchange, they were purchased and used for Masternodes.

You are making accusations that are unsupported and more importantly, can't be refuted, because that would require proving a negative - that's logically impossible.

Do better.

 

[MrAli]

You are leaving because there is no logical explanation, @Jeffrey.

Think about what you just wrote:

You claim you don't own this address, and you guess it might be "a user withdrawing large balances."

If this address belongs to a random user or an unknown entity:

**Why did 120,400 PIVX of public treasury funds from your proposal address (`DHQHLf...`) get transferred directly into this user's wallet via transaction `ca82cf366d392b9ff9e96b6d020ba615925bf0c054deeaf481299822ab359751`?**

And why did that same wallet immediately deploy **25 Masternodes** in transaction `74e1436c70902602a1e5c9424a18b70dcb7ad835dfee0117f6e280feaf0e30a6`?

Saying "Done here" and walking away does not erase the on-chain ledger. The community now has the exact transaction hashes showing where the DAO treasury actually went.

 

[MrAli]

It was sarcasm in that you should be able to figure it out yourself, to determine which is which. What I understood when he said 'no clue', is that he has no time to waste on your failed logic.

I have not followed the transactions on a block explorer yet. But it seems perfectly logical to me, given we have so many Masternodes now, and there are difficulties with liquidity making it hard to find PIV to buy for those Masternodes, that the instant that PIVX was put into liquidity at an Exchange, they were purchased and used for Masternodes.

You are making accusations that are unsupported and more importantly, can't be refuted, because that would require proving a negative - that's logically impossible.

Do better.

Nice fairy tale, @Eric_Stanek, but that’s not how blockchains work.

You just said: *"I have not followed the transactions on a block explorer yet."*

Maybe you should look before making up stories:

If someone bought those coins on an exchange, the transaction would show an exchange deposit and an exchange withdrawal.

Instead, transaction `ca82cf366d392b9ff9e96b6d020ba615925bf0c054deeaf481299822ab359751` is a **direct peer-to-peer on-chain consolidation** straight from Jeffrey's intermediary address into wallet `DT2hoNn3n3bB8b8QRoqvqWM9y3e7wo8XXz`! There is zero exchange interaction anywhere in this path.

And that exact wallet immediately minted 25 Masternodes.

The ledger is permanent and verifiable. Trying to invent excuses for transactions you haven't even looked at only makes this look worse.

 

[Jeffrey]

You need to learn how exchanges work. That user is withdrawing funds from the exact same address. Funny thing is I actually noticed this address and thought it belonged to you.

If exchange has 140k PIVX
100k in their cold storage
30k in user A deposit address
10k in User B deposit address

User C buys 25k PIVX and withdraws. There is a potential for those funds to come from the hot wallets aka the funds of User A or B.

Anyway I’ve provided the answer you can review it and see all the addresses are connected through an exchang. Could be MEXC or XT or WEEX

 

[MrAli]

You need to learn how exchanges work. That user is withdrawing funds from the exact same address. Funny thing is I actually noticed this address and thought it belonged to you.

If exchange has 140k PIVX
100k in their cold storage
30k in user A deposit address
10k in User B deposit address

User C buys 25k PIVX and withdraws. There is a potential for those funds to come from the hot wallets aka the funds of User A or B.

Anyway I’ve provided the answer you can review it and see all the addresses are connected through an exchang. Could be MEXC or XT or WEEX

If that wallet belonged to me, @Jeffrey, then why did 120,400 PIVX leave **your own proposal address** to fund it?

And please stop inventing theories:
No exchange on earth (MEXC, XT, or WEEX) has only 10 transactions in its entire history, and **no exchange uses customer funds to run 25 voting Masternodes** on the PIVX network.

The transactions speak for themselves.

 

[MrAli]

I see that discussions are happening in the community right now. Come forward and speak your minds.

This is supposed to be a free community.

In the past, whenever someone spoke up, Eric and his friends would gang up on them from all sides and silence them. But now the floor is open and the truth is out.

Why stay silent now? Speak up.

 

[Eric_Stanek]

You are leaving because there is no logical explanation, @Jeffrey.

Think about what you just wrote:

You claim you don't own this address, and you guess it might be "a user withdrawing large balances."

If this address belongs to a random user or an unknown entity:

**Why did 120,400 PIVX of public treasury funds from your proposal address (`DHQHLf...`) get transferred directly into this user's wallet via transaction `ca82cf366d392b9ff9e96b6d020ba615925bf0c054deeaf481299822ab359751`?**

And why did that same wallet immediately deploy **25 Masternodes** in transaction `74e1436c70902602a1e5c9424a18b70dcb7ad835dfee0117f6e280feaf0e30a6`?

Saying "Done here" and walking away does not erase the on-chain ledger. The community now has the exact transaction hashes showing where the DAO treasury actually went.

OK. I did my homework on this.

Most of what you say is true, except the 'directly' part. There was nothing direct about it all. Along the way, the funds clearly became intermixed at an exchange. Since people buy PIV from exchanges to make Masternodes, and we have seen a huge surge in Masternode count, this makes perfect sense. The blockchain supports that - which is exactly what I surmised earlier.

Now for the details.
The PIVXMMFund11 proposal was paid out from the network here:

Address: DHQHLfFdyLBY25bKLprn1mJxakyPbdmNq3
TxID: c8571e55fe865905a7c22c9f6204bc46fdb19468f6d26be4a8c62ad1130f6360
Block: 5572805 (Sep 6, 2026, 01:29:00 AM)
Explorer: https://explorer.pivx.org/#/address/DHQHLfFdyLBY25bKLprn1mJxakyPbdmNq3

Approx 16 days later, the funds move to here:

Address: DQQUmWrAcr9HbtBoUFiPQ2Fw2TRgL9Kby4
TxID: 49e0326cc93ef53b0ebc3815101e5c1d06532f86a0c84c94f5ca56841934c4c3
Block: 5596113 (Sep 22, 2026, 03:41:15 PM)
Explorer: https://explorer.pivx.org/#/tx/49e0326cc93ef53b0ebc3815101e5c1d06532f86a0c84c94f5ca56841934c4c3

Approx 12 days later, they moved to here, where they were combined with approx 310K other PIV into 2 outputs:

Address: DT2hoNn3n3bB8b8QRoqvqWM9y3e7wo8XXz (400,000 PIV) / DLkFrbvFDroxaEhtiFU3htXE6avx1W6jZi (30,599 PIV)
TxID: ca82cf366d392b9ff9e96b6d020ba615925bf0c054deeaf481299822ab359751
Block: 5613758 (Oct 5, 2026, 05:32:30 AM)
Explorer: https://explorer.pivx.org/#/tx/ca82cf366d392b9ff9e96b6d020ba615925bf0c054deeaf481299822ab359751

Then following the DT2hoNn3n3bB8b8QRoqvqWM9y3e7wo8XXz address we see the above transaction of 400,000 PIV was combined with many other large transactions with total received at over 4 MILLION PIV!
Absolutely looks like an exchange address to me!

Now, note that the 400,000 PIV we are following, were added to that address at block 5,613,758 (3 days ago) but the TxID you reference, happened at block 5,604,300 (10 days ago)! That's proof that the '25 masternodes' were NOT created using the 400,000 PIV you were following. They were created a full week prior with funds from other addresses that were part of the 4 MILLION PIV deposited to that address.

Address: DT2hoNn3n3bB8b8QRoqvqWM9y3e7wo8XXz
TxID: 74e1436c70902602a1e5c9424a18b70dcb7ad835dfee0117f6e280feaf0e30a6
Block: 5,604,300 (Sep 28, 2026, 11:47:30 AM)
Explorer: https://explorer.pivx.org/#/tx/74e1436c70902602a1e5c9424a18b70dcb7ad835dfee0117f6e280feaf0e30a6

You owe Jeffrey an apology sir.

 

[Eric_Stanek]

But now the floor is open and the truth is out.

Correction. NOW the truth is out.

 

[Gerrald]

I have tried to get Mrali and @Cryptosi to work together for this. No one is going to sit there and scan through every transaction. I keep getting asked and I haven't got the time and really cba. Lets get this dao watch ai to answer the questions and provide evidence.

 

[ONeZetty]

PIVX is a privacy project. I am not required to tell you what address I do or do not own. L. You would see one of those belongs to an exchange

Yes and no. It is entirely true that PIVX is a privacy coin, but we must distinguish between individual user privacy and the institutional transparency required by a DAO. The very spirit of the project allows for the use of transparent addresses precisely when it is necessary to check, audit, or verify the flow of funds. I understand that, due to strategic or role-related reasons, details of certain agreements cannot be disclosed; however, it is delicate—and even dangerous—for professional or institutional transactions to be handled via obfuscated methods. Accountability strengthens trust in governance.

 

[Eric_Stanek]

Yes and no. It is entirely true that PIVX is a privacy coin, but we must distinguish between individual user privacy and the institutional transparency required by a DAO. The very spirit of the project allows for the use of transparent addresses precisely when it is necessary to check, audit, or verify the flow of funds. I understand that, due to strategic or role-related reasons, details of certain agreements cannot be disclosed; however, it is delicate—and even dangerous—for professional or institutional transactions to be handled via obfuscated methods. Accountability strengthens trust in governance.

I think you are missing the point. The 2 addresses in question are already at an exchange. Or - is one of those addresses yours @ONeZetty ! Maybe you and Jeffery are colluding together! Of course, I am just joking, but that is how ridiculous the implications were.

At the end of the day, the 3rd party receiving the funds; an exchange, a Market Maker, or a service like TaskOn, is going to have to publish a receive address, and then Jeffrey can prove funds flowed there. After that, it is out of Jeffrey's control. But, are all those 3rd parties willing to let their PIVX addresses be made public like that? Further, even if they did, how do we know there wasn't a 'kick back' negotiated? We don't!

But, we all know each other, and completely understand how valuable trust is. That's why we would never do something unethical with the funds, because once trust is broken - that person is done - not just in PIVX - but in the industry. That's why when I see baseless claims that expect someone to prove the negative (a logical impossibility) I am quick to defend them.

I strongly suspect Mr. Ali used AI to 'report out' on the flow of funds in the chain, and it made basic mistakes. He mentioned doing such a report before, and this is why I asked that he be transparent and provide that report. I have asked 3 or 4 times. Nothing yet.