Registration is only required for posting topics or replies. To register, make a request on any of the PIVX social media or chat channels.
NOTE: To enhance forum security, new accounts that have no posts within a 30-day period are subject to being deleted.
Server: 132.163.96.2 (time.nist.gov)
Poll interval: 34min 8s (min: 32s; max 34min 8s)
Leap: normal
Version: 3
Stratum: 1
Reference: NIST
Precision: 1us (-29)
Root distance: 610us (max: 5s)
Offset: +3.471ms
Delay: 47.639ms
Jitter: 16.339ms
Packet count: 10
Frequency: -17.313ppm
Hello Palmtree
timedatectl status
Hmm, the block height should be the same maybe at worst off by one. I would check to see if you are forked. https://toolbox.pivx.org/forkedAs a last resort I bought a Real Time Clock Module RTC; it should arrive Saturday May 4th.
I will keep you posted.
By the way, is it normal that my two PIVX MasterNodes have different BLOCK-HEIGHT?
View attachment 1651
P.S. To make sure there is nothing wrong with the server where my two MasterNodes are hosted, I am running my PIVX wallet on a win10 machine using a software called NetTime; let's see if I still have time difference issues.
did you do it for both?Current number of blocks: 4365658
Last Block Hash: 78b2721dafe5f4ac836b9831f5968af6e14ce4a64f360493410603cad96963ef
I get: You are on the correct chain
So, from their side, is everything ok?
That one looks good, what about for the second MN?This is what I got after executing getblockchaininfo
Code:{ "chain": "main", "blocks": 4366643, "headers": 4366643, "bestblockhash": "2c95f298fa1e8e560e591589fdf7794e68439a764ecec858ffb8b3d5a611e522", "difficulty": 10233.65617941118, "verificationprogress": 0.999999891955209, "chainwork": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000468ee4c7131ac16f9e", "shield_pool_value": { "chainValue": 766569.12239412, "valueDelta": 0.00000000 }, "initial_block_downloading": false, "softforks": [ { "id": "bip65", "version": 5, "reject": { "status": true } } ], "upgrades": { "PoS": { "activationheight": 259201, "status": "active", "info": "Proof of Stake Consensus activation" }, "PoS v2": { "activationheight": 615800, "status": "active", "info": "New selection for stake modifier" }, "Zerocoin": { "activationheight": 863787, "status": "active", "info": "ZeroCoin protocol activation - start block v4" }, "Zerocoin v2": { "activationheight": 1153160, "status": "active", "info": "New zerocoin serials and zPOS start" }, "BIP65": { "activationheight": 1808634, "status": "active", "info": "CLTV (BIP65) activation - start block v5" }, "Zerocoin Public": { "activationheight": 1880000, "status": "active", "info": "Activation of zerocoin public spends (spend v3)" }, "PIVX v3.4": { "activationheight": 1967000, "status": "active", "info": "New 256-bit stake modifier - start block v6" }, "PIVX v4.0": { "activationheight": 2153200, "status": "active", "info": "New message sigs - start block v7 - time protocol - zc spend v4" }, "v5 shield": { "activationheight": 2700500, "status": "active", "info": "Sapling Shield - start block v8 - start transaction v3" }, "PIVX v5.2": { "activationheight": 2927000, "status": "active", "info": "New cold-staking rules" }, "PIVX v5.3": { "activationheight": 3014000, "status": "active", "info": "New staking rules" }, "PIVX v5.5": { "activationheight": 3715200, "status": "active", "info": "New rewards structure" }, "PIVX v5.6": { "activationheight": 4281680, "status": "active", "info": "Exchange address" } }, "warnings": "" }
Does it look ok?
if your still getting rewards for both nodes about every day, then those are fine so no need to worry.
The pi version should also be fine, many people use it without issue.
If you join the PIVX Discord, there's many more eyes on the posts along with some developers and your issues would most likely get resolved much faster. Very few people use the forum.