Search results

Update on the proposal: The month is not finished yet but in the last two weeks (due to exams and stuff) I did not have the time to develop as much as I wanted, so the first payout will cover both March and April and the second will cover May

At the moment we are more or less between 20 and 25 %

Name: To be added Term: 2 Cycles Cycle Amnt: 30,000 Total Amnt: 60,000 Author: Alessandro Rezzi Receiver: Alessandro Rezzi Address: DTqBQRNMCgBexQbrTozQwWe3s9Ld8Hjf19 Created: 3-03-2024 Status: Active Vote Hash: c88b635f1ca7c8d01c91be1706920b42c57c319999f1f53628851282f70c6656 Proposal info...

Name: Ale dev December Term: 1 Cycles Cycle Amnt: 30,000 Total Amnt: 30,000 Author: Alessandro Rezzi Receiver: Alessandro Rezzi Address: DP91drj7qc7FrPRwdaKi1wdsqrEt9zJthv Created: 8-11-2023 Status: Active Vote Hash: 49b8a6353c4e254010b5e8b0ff1c3463d6196f27f6e29f3bf361b75be9607f87 Proposal...

Name: Ale dev Oct./Nov. Term: 2 Cycles Cycle Amnt: 32,000 Total Amnt: 64,000 Author: Alessandro Rezzi Receiver: Alessandro Rezzi Address: DH2N9umb8P6fvbx8Q5HqfFjjjhcbzpDG5M Created: 13-09-2023 Status: Active Vote Hash: c18ab9675b56383f2434c56194b80a2edaef6fae026f4450d87bc9289927382b Proposal...

Hi thanks for the review! The optimization will make only the block size smaller, so smaller blockchain size over time

Name: Ale dev Aug./Sept. Term: 2 Cycles Cycle Amnt: 25,000 Total Amnt: 50,000 Author: Alessandro Rezzi Receiver: Alessandro Rezzi Address: D5jvTRbtTQEkUcLpJBjFmd6ig9Q1pzErhz Created: 14-07-2023 Status: Active Vote Hash: 7e5d0ec3f6fd1830efb4abea7dc94301050744bb5f89feabdfec57c6332f5d23 Proposal...

Ok so let me clarify my thoughts: I agree with you that my message was more appropriate to be sent on the developer channel on discord rather than here, but now is too late. I still think that the work done by Liquid on the last cycle has absolutely not been enough for the position of core...

Not proposed in your proposal but that 2 PRs has been literally all the core developer work you have done this last cycle I honestly don't see any communication issue, I would have said the same to any other dev (Duddino, Kitty, Bread...) if I considered their work not good enough (but I think...

Yes! Sadly due to university exams I will have to quit development for the next month (That's why I did not publish another proposal) Deterministic masternodes are at the same point as the last month, i.e. the last PR is still waiting for reviews https://github.com/PIVX-Project/PIVX/pull/2844...

I wanted to wait for the end of the cycle of May before posting my opinion on this proposal: As already stated on the Labs discord I think that the current core dev team has many problems and this is one of them. Last cycle Liquid received 30k PIVs and contributed with exactly 2 Pull requests...

From the proposal is not clear how those vps are related to PIVX, can you give more details?

Thanks for clarifications (y)

I have two questions, all the other devs (Kitty Duddino Fuzz and me) have been really clear about what they have done and a clear roadmap/plan on what they are going to do, so for example on: Why are you including your name in shield improvements? (I guess you are talking about shield staking...

Name: Ale dev (April) Term: 1 Cycle Cycle Amnt: 15,000 Total Amnt: 15,000 Author: Alessandro Rezzi Receiver: Alessandro Rezzi Address: DBtY8Mv8aw7mnMc8q1zs3RMqE1vRqXsPJQ Created: 11-04-2023 Status: Active Vote Hash: 9b7f7d0b5a990f96fd0c0cee8948a0dfe271fbd88d03b872d2aebb67d3252136 Proposal...

Name: Ale dev (April) Term: 1 Cycle Cycle Amnt: 25,000 Total Amnt: 25,000 Author: Alessandro Rezzi Receiver: Alessandro Rezzi Address: D7ySMkdHbgoUPVx921knSpfjapn6XL8sYW Created: 09-03-2023 Status: Active Vote Hash: 2d3862110a1cc1d68401fe0bec0ed81ec3f5691acf902ab2dbc81acb27f4558c Proposal...

Nope staking is random and any attempt to make it deterministic will only weaken the network

Hi, our DMNs implementation will follow indeed the DASH protocol (i.e DASH dip3 dip6 dip7 and dip8), however there will be differences the main one is that we will support ipv4 ipv6 and TOR masternodes, while DASH only supports ipv4. Said that the implementation is not simply "using their code"...