Kyeno
Pivian
1. Does that mean you're completely ruling out some things that were mentioned or even popped as more important in this thread alone?:
- Security/stability: Updating the entire tech stack at least to the "latest stable possible" (considering outdated core) versions of both server daemons and Symfony + Node packages?
- Security/stability: Fixing a few of existing bugs or things mistreated by the server migration alone?
- "Hit by the truck" scenario: Completing and updating technical documentation, writing more step-by-step migration and maintenance guidelines, preparing custom .deb packages?
- Marketing: Landing pages templates with instructions how to utilize them /or/ proposing integration with one of the existing out-of-the-box web creators?
- Marketing: Refactoring news flashes to pull from beforementioned medium.com's account?
- Marketing: Campaign imagery offered by Meerkat?
2. You yourself seemed to be extremely happy with Web2Discord bridge once it was initially created and made alive; but then again - time flies, things change. It's your call.
3. Please note that the support alone does not happen only Discord's #support channel alone. I mentioned in the initial text it's more aimed towards the technical team alone; more of consultancy than "support" if you prefer the term.
- I myself have supported @Sparrow, @shorn and @Liquid369 technically and programmatically entirely for free, during my free time and without any formal or non-formal obligation to do so with things related to PIVX.org, Symfony and UNIXes.
- I have supported PIVX Labz' developers (and still do) in technical/architectural decision making process and word of advice; that includes Vue.js being a choice for MPW and organisational/structural refactoring happening.
- I have supported yourself and MANY OTHER members around, often pro-actively (which - as I understand - is nowadays punished and not rewarded) and aimed to do so even more intensively during the duration of this very proposal.
4. Even after I left, there were various discussions about plenty *broken* structures/marketing messages in the PIVX.org structure which is still burdened by Chris' initial designs.
Again in my initial text I stated working on block explorer OR said restructuring. Let it be and *at least* redesigning/restructuring the home page to fit the current state of affairs much more/better than it currently does. Mind that site was built with @furszy commiting like a machine gun in mind and focused on promoting the desktop client. Times changed. I believe I don't even have to elaborate on that.
If you think those things don't provide value because "the website isn't viewed a lot (SEO-wise)" - you are wrong. Even if it's not hitting the radar of regular bread eaters (that's a WHOLE DIFFERENT point of discussion), it is A BUSINESS CARD used by @Jeffrey/@guapic (and others involved) during various business integrations they discuss. And you probably know this yourself - there are meetings to which you really should be wearing at least Rolex watch; not to mention Patek Philippe or Audemars Piguet.
...and last but not least: You asked why is this proposal happening under Labz. Short answer being - because both me and Meerkat ARE Labz team members since the dawn of time; actually since Labz were still called PIVX Undeground. Why is it posted by me and not Labz then? I live by the schedule; I wanted to get this done and confirmed ASAP to be able to "move some energies around" using Snappy's narrative. JSKitty was busy and could sit to that only within the next few days. We shared the tasks. #teamwork
Then finally and concluding: if you look around - each Labz dev is getting pretty much fixed 30k PIV per capita per month and just continues working on their deliverables spending their time most efficiently at given tasks. Here you are getting TWO Labz devs (yes, don't forget that aside from design alone Meerkat is a front-end developer) for the 75% of the regular price; just as a "welcome back gift".
This proposal again is not selling you exact TODOs; those are (as we see) being shaped and discussed, then it's our job to fit as many of them within the 1-month-timeframe as possible.
This proposal is selling you two full-time devs for a month, where one of them is a designer and a front-end dev and the other is a architect, sysadm, devops and a full-stack dev.
- Security/stability: Updating the entire tech stack at least to the "latest stable possible" (considering outdated core) versions of both server daemons and Symfony + Node packages?
- Security/stability: Fixing a few of existing bugs or things mistreated by the server migration alone?
- "Hit by the truck" scenario: Completing and updating technical documentation, writing more step-by-step migration and maintenance guidelines, preparing custom .deb packages?
- Marketing: Landing pages templates with instructions how to utilize them /or/ proposing integration with one of the existing out-of-the-box web creators?
- Marketing: Refactoring news flashes to pull from beforementioned medium.com's account?
- Marketing: Campaign imagery offered by Meerkat?
2. You yourself seemed to be extremely happy with Web2Discord bridge once it was initially created and made alive; but then again - time flies, things change. It's your call.
3. Please note that the support alone does not happen only Discord's #support channel alone. I mentioned in the initial text it's more aimed towards the technical team alone; more of consultancy than "support" if you prefer the term.
- I myself have supported @Sparrow, @shorn and @Liquid369 technically and programmatically entirely for free, during my free time and without any formal or non-formal obligation to do so with things related to PIVX.org, Symfony and UNIXes.
- I have supported PIVX Labz' developers (and still do) in technical/architectural decision making process and word of advice; that includes Vue.js being a choice for MPW and organisational/structural refactoring happening.
- I have supported yourself and MANY OTHER members around, often pro-actively (which - as I understand - is nowadays punished and not rewarded) and aimed to do so even more intensively during the duration of this very proposal.
4. Even after I left, there were various discussions about plenty *broken* structures/marketing messages in the PIVX.org structure which is still burdened by Chris' initial designs.
Again in my initial text I stated working on block explorer OR said restructuring. Let it be and *at least* redesigning/restructuring the home page to fit the current state of affairs much more/better than it currently does. Mind that site was built with @furszy commiting like a machine gun in mind and focused on promoting the desktop client. Times changed. I believe I don't even have to elaborate on that.
If you think those things don't provide value because "the website isn't viewed a lot (SEO-wise)" - you are wrong. Even if it's not hitting the radar of regular bread eaters (that's a WHOLE DIFFERENT point of discussion), it is A BUSINESS CARD used by @Jeffrey/@guapic (and others involved) during various business integrations they discuss. And you probably know this yourself - there are meetings to which you really should be wearing at least Rolex watch; not to mention Patek Philippe or Audemars Piguet.
...and last but not least: You asked why is this proposal happening under Labz. Short answer being - because both me and Meerkat ARE Labz team members since the dawn of time; actually since Labz were still called PIVX Undeground. Why is it posted by me and not Labz then? I live by the schedule; I wanted to get this done and confirmed ASAP to be able to "move some energies around" using Snappy's narrative. JSKitty was busy and could sit to that only within the next few days. We shared the tasks. #teamwork
Then finally and concluding: if you look around - each Labz dev is getting pretty much fixed 30k PIV per capita per month and just continues working on their deliverables spending their time most efficiently at given tasks. Here you are getting TWO Labz devs (yes, don't forget that aside from design alone Meerkat is a front-end developer) for the 75% of the regular price; just as a "welcome back gift".
This proposal again is not selling you exact TODOs; those are (as we see) being shaped and discussed, then it's our job to fit as many of them within the 1-month-timeframe as possible.
This proposal is selling you two full-time devs for a month, where one of them is a designer and a front-end dev and the other is a architect, sysadm, devops and a full-stack dev.